Analisis Regulasi Hukum Penggunaan Serangga sebagai Bioindikator Kualitas Lingkungan di Indonesia: Studi Normatif-Komparatif

Authors

  • Nhyra Kamala Putri Universitas Teuku Umar, Aceh Barat, Indonesia
  • Agung Munandar Universitas Teuku Umar, Aceh Barat, Indonesia
  • Nana Ariska Universitas Teuku Umar, Aceh Barat, Indonesia
  • Hilmina Itawarnemi Universitas Teuku Umar, Aceh Barat, Indonesia
  • Maulidil Fajri Universitas Teuku Umar, Aceh Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i2.1488

Keywords:

Biomonitoring, Celah Regulasi, Tata Kelola Lingkungan Berbasis Bukti Ilmiah

Abstract

Serangga merupakan organisme yang sensitif terhadap perubahan lingkungan sehingga banyak digunakan sebagai bioindikator kualitas lingkungan. Meskipun berbagai penelitian di Indonesia menunjukkan efektivitas penggunaannya pada ekosistem perairan dan terestrial, kedudukannya dalam sistem hukum lingkungan hidup belum banyak dikaji. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan pemanfaatan serangga sebagai bioindikator kualitas lingkungan, mengidentifikasi celah regulasi (regulatory gap), serta merumuskan rekomendasi penguatannya. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum lingkungan Indonesia telah menyediakan landasan normatif bagi penggunaan bioindikator serangga melalui pengaturan aspek hayati, keanekaragaman hayati, fungsi ekologis, dan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan sehingga tidak terdapat kekosongan hukum (legal lacuna). Namun, terdapat regulatory gap pada tingkat operasional dan teknis karena biomonitoring berbasis serangga belum terintegrasi secara memadai ke dalam instrumen penilaian, pemantauan, dan evaluasi lingkungan hidup. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan optimalisasi instrumen yang telah ada serta penyempurnaan pengaturan teknis untuk mendukung integrasi biomonitoring berbasis serangga dalam sistem perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup di Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alves, D., Teixeira, F. B., Teófilo, M. N. G., Camilo-Cotrim, C. F., Silva, J. A. de P., Almeida, L. M., & Bailão, E. F. L. C. (2024). Use of Ecotoxicological Bioindicators in Effluent Monitoring Legal Implications in Brazil. Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental, 29. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-415220230054

Aminudin, C. (2020). Peranan Sains Warga Dalam Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Ekologi Masyarakat Dan Sains, 1(2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.55448/ems.v1i2.8

Anamika, A., Singh, M. K., Khan, A. A., Kumari, V., Meena, S., & Lata, R. K. (2024). Biotic Indices Freshwater Ecosystems Using Aquatic Entomofauna as a Bioindicator. Journal of Applied Bioscience, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.61081/joab/50v1i101

Armitage, D., Berkes, F., & Doubleday, N. (Eds.). (2007). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC Press. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774855457

Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish (2nd ed., EPA 841-B-99-002). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20004OQK.txt

Buchori, D., Rizali, A., Rahayu, G. A., & Mansur, I. (2018). Insect diversity in post-mining areas: Investigating their potential role as bioindicator of reclamation success. Biodiversitas, 19(5), 1696–1702. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190515

Chowdhury, S., Dubey, V., Choudhury, S., Das, A., Jeengar, D., Sujatha, D., Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Semwal, A., & Kumar, V. (2023). Insects as bioindicator: A hidden gem for environmental monitoring. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1146052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1146052

Cuffney, T. G., Gurtz, M. E., & Meador, M. R. (1993). Guidelines for processing and quality assurance of benthic invertebrate samples collected as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program (USGS Open-File Report 93-407). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93407

Diantari, N. P. R., Ahyadi, H., Rohyani, I. S., & Suana, I. W. (2017). Diversity of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera as bioindicator of water quality in Jangkok River, West Nusa Tenggara. Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia, 14(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.5994/jei.14.3.135

Dickinson, G. M. (2026). Law proofing the future. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 63, 81–136. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jol/wp-content/uploads/sites/86/2026/01/03-HLL-63-1_Dickinson81-136.pdf

European Commission. (2003). Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC): Guidance document no. 6: Towards a guidance on establishment of the intercalibration network and on the process on the intercalibration exercise. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/agua/publicaciones/Guia6_tcm30-163001.pdf

European Commission. (2011). Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC): Guidance document no. 14: Guidance document on the intercalibration process 2008–2011 (Technical Report - 2011 - 045). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/61fbcb5b-eb52-44fd-810a-63735d5e4775/IC_GUIDANCE_FINAL_16Dec2010.pdf

European Commission. (2018). Commission Decision (EU) 2018/229 of 12 February 2018 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Commission Decision 2013/480/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, L 47, 1–91. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2018/229/oj

European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327, 1–73. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060

Fabricius, C., & Currie, B. (2015). Adaptive co-management. In C. R. Allen & A. S. Garmestani (Eds.), Adaptive management of social-ecological systems (pp. 147–179). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_9

Fraisl, D., Hager, G., Bedessem, B., Gold, M. M., Hsing, P., Danielsen, F., Hitchcock, C., Hulbert, J. M., Piera, J., Spiers, H., Thiel, M., & Haklay, M. (2022). Citizen Science in Environmental and Ecological Sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4

Gibson, G. R., Barbour, M. T., Stribling, J. B., Gerritsen, J., & Karr, J. R. (1996). Biological criteria: Technical guidance for streams and small rivers (revised edition, EPA 822-B-96-001). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20003GSJ.txt

Handinata, L., & Muntalif, B. S. (2017). Bioassessment Kualitas Air Sungai Cikaro Kabupaten Bandung Menggunakan Status Ekologi. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 23(2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2016.23.2.3

Ibrahim, A., & Sjarmidi, A. (2017). Pengembangan Metode Bioasesmen Untuk Penilaian Kualitas Air Sungai Cihampelas Di DAS Citarum. Jurnal Sumber Daya Air, 13(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.32679/jsda.v13i1.173

Information Quality Act, Pub. L. No. 106-554, § 515, 114 Stat. 2763A-153–154 (2000) (codified at 44 U.S.C. § 3516 note). https://sourcebook.acus.gov/wiki/Information_Quality_Act

Jordan, A., & Gravey, V. (Eds.). (2021). Environmental policy in the EU: Actors, institutions and processes (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402333

Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. (2024). Indikator pembangunan lingkungan hidup dalam rencana pembangunan jangka panjang nasional 2025–2045 (Revisi II). Direktorat Lingkungan Hidup, Kedeputian Kemaritiman dan Sumber Daya Alam, Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Lakshmi, J., Abraham, K. M., Nandakumar, S., & Kumar, M. G. S. (2021). Aquatic Insects, a Tool for Monitoring the Health of Riverine Ecosystem, a Case Study of Killiyar, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Sustainability Agri Food and Environmental Research-Discontinued, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.7770/safer-v0n0-art2287

Lauterpacht, H. (1958). The development of international law by the International Court. Stevens & Sons.

Liaqat, I., Ali, N. M., & Virk, N. (2023). Recent Advances in Evaluating Insects as Bioindicators of Heavy Metal Pollution. In B. A. Almayyahi (Ed.), Heavy Metals - Recent Advances. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110212

Machuca‐Sepúlveda, J., Miranda, J., Lefin, N., Pedroso, A., Beltrán, J. F., & Farías, J. G. (2023). Current Status of Omics in Biological Quality Elements for Freshwater Biomonitoring. Biology, 12(7), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070923

Medhi, J., Dutta, J., & Kalita, M. C. (2021). Biomonitoring Ecosystem: Modelling Relationship With Arthropods. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94313

Monaghan, K. A. (2016). Four reasons to question the accuracy of a biotic index; The risk of metric bias and the scope to improve accuracy. PLoS ONE, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158383

Nugraha, D. R., Tugiyono, Susanto, G. N., & Kanedi, M. (2024). Struktur Komunitas Makrozoobentos Sebagai Bioindikator Kualitas Air Di Sungai Way Awi, Bandarlampung. Journal of Biota, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.24002/biota.v9i3.8744

Nuraeni, S., Khusna HM, A., & Sadapotto, A. (2019). Keanekaragaman Serangga Air Dan Biomonitoring Berbasis Indeks Famili Biotik. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Dan Konservasi Alam, 16(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.20886/jphka.2019.16.2.147-157

OECD (2025), OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2025, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/56b60e39-en.

Okeke, T. E., Ewuim, S. C., Ononye, B. U., Chukwudebelu, A. E., & Mbelede, K. C. (2024). Efficiency of Different Techniques in Collecting Insects in Environments Exposed to Palm Oil and Spent Engine Oil Effluents in Abakiliki, Ebonyi State. Asian Journal of Research in Zoology, 7(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajriz/2024/v7i1139

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Ratnasari, D., Fajar, M. T. I., & Elhany, N. A. (2023). Uji Kualitas Air Sungai Di Desa Sumberkolak Kecamatan Panarukan Kabupaten Situbondo. Biogenic Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 1(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.36841/biogenic.v1i2.3749

Rocha, J. R. M. da, Almeida, J. R. de, Lins, G. A., & Durval, A. (2010). Insects as Indicators of Environmental Changing and Pollution: A Review of Appropriate Species and Their Monitoring. Holos Environment, 10(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.14295/holos.v10i2.2996

Rosner, A., Ballarin, L., Barnay-Verdier, S., Borisenko, I., Drago, L., Drobne, D., Concetta Eliso, M., Harbuzov, Z., Grimaldi, A., Guy-Haim, T., Karahan, A., Lynch, I., Lionetto, M. G., Martinez, P., Mehennaoui, K., Oruc Ozcan, E., Pinsino, A., Paz, G., Rinkevich, B., … Cambier, S. (2024). A broad-taxa approach as an important concept in ecotoxicological studies and pollution monitoring. Biological Reviews, 99(1), 131–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13015

Soininen, N., Romppanen, S., Nieminen, M., & Soimakallio, S. (2023). The impact-based regulatory strategy in environmental law: Hallmark of effectiveness or pitfall for legitimacy? Journal of Environmental Law, 35(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad013

Suci, R. W. (2016). Serangga Air Sebagai Indikator Biologis Cemaran Air Di Sungai Cikaniki, Desa Citalahab, Tn. Gunung Halimun Salak, Jawa Barat. Risenologi, 1(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.47028/j.risenologi.2016.12.27

Suheriyanto, D., Lutfiyah, A., Dara W., D., Farhan, M., & Izzah, A. (2020). The Potency of Soil Insect As Soil Quality Bioindicators in Citrus Plantations Poncokusumo District, Malang Regency. El-Hayah: Jurnal Biologi, 7(4), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.18860/elha.v7i4.10667

Trianto, M., Nuraini, N., Sukmawati, S., & Kisman, M. D. (2020). Keanekaragaman Genus Serangga Air Sebagai Bioindikator Kualitas Perairan. Justek Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 3(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.v3i2.3562

van Asselt, H., Vesa, S., & Huhta, K. (2025). Towards a future-proof environmental law? In H. van Asselt, S. Vesa, & K. Huhta (Eds.), Future-proofing law in a time of environmental emergency (pp. 1–19). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035343805.00005

Wijaya, H., Nugroho, A. P., & Widyastuti, M. (2025). Biomonitoring Kesehatan Ekosistem Sungai Menggunakan Serangga Akuatik di Sungai Bedog, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 23(4), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.23.4.1140-1148

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Kamala Putri, N., Munandar, A., Ariska, N., Itawarnemi, H., & Fajri, M. (2026). Analisis Regulasi Hukum Penggunaan Serangga sebagai Bioindikator Kualitas Lingkungan di Indonesia: Studi Normatif-Komparatif. Binamulia Hukum, 15(2), 845–870. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i2.1488