Application of the Corporate Rescue Concept in Indonesian Bankruptcy Law: Urgency and Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v3i2.1138Keywords:
Corporate Rescue Concept, Bankruptcy, Debt Restructuring, PKPU, Law ReformAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Corporate Rescue Concept within Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (Bankruptcy Law) and to identify its weaknesses, as well as the urgency for legal reform to optimize the business rescue function. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, utilizing doctrinal analysis, comparative law, and a literature review of the Bankruptcy Law’s provisions and its practical implementation. The findings indicate that while the Bankruptcy Law incorporates the Corporate Rescue Concept through the PKPU mechanism and the peace plan, its provisions remain limited and predominantly focus on liquidation. Three critical issues were identified: (1) the lack of detailed provisions on debt restructuring mechanisms, (2) the absence of standards for business feasibility assessments, and (3) insufficient oversight in the implementation of rescue plans. The study concludes by recommending amendments to the Bankruptcy Law to better emphasize the principle of business rescue, including: (1) the regulation of comprehensive restructuring schemes, (2) the establishment of an independent supervisory body, and (3) the provision of incentives for creditors. These reforms are crucial to strike a balance between creditor protection and the continuity of debtor businesses.
Downloads
References
Akyas, M. (2022). Eksekusi Lelang Oleh Kreditor Separatis Pada Masa Perdamaian Dalam Kajian Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan dan Ke-PPAT-An, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i2.809
Amboro, F. Y. P. (2020). Restrukturisasi Utang Terhadap Perusahaan Go Public Dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.103-111
Arimba, C. I. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Hakim Pengawas Terhadap Harta Pailit. Begawan Abioso, 14(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.37893/abioso.v14i2.708
Dirmansyah, N. O., Syalsabila, L., & Lestari, H. S. (2022). Pengaruh Likuiditas Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Ekonomi, 27(1), 49–63.
Fitria, A. (2018). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Debitor Mencegah Kepailitan. Lex Jurnalica, 15(1), 18–28.
Kornelis, Y., & Amboro, F. Y. P. (2020). Implementasi Restrukturisasi Dalam Prosesi Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang di Indonesia. Jurnal Selat, 7(2), 237–277. https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v7i2.1739
Nugraha, R. M., Machmud, A., & Fuad, F. (2023). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Aset Milik Pihak Ketiga yang Dijaminkan Kepada Kreditur Dalam Kepailitan. Binamulia Hukum, 12(1), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.504
Omar, P. J., & Gant, J. (2016). Corporate Rescue in the United Kingdom: Past, Present and Future Reforms. Australian Insolvency Law Journal, 40(24), 1–28.
Omar, P. J., & Gant, J. (2021). Research Handbook on Corporate Restructuring. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Saija, R. (2019). Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali di Pengadilan Niaga. SASI, 24(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126
Salsabila, I. D., & Hakim, A. R. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur yang Diputus Pailit dan Masih Mampu Membayar Utang Kepada Kreditur. Kabilah: Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 202–213.
Sari, L. P., Muslihah, M., Mutohari, R., & Sari, R. N. (2024). Dampak Krisis Keuangan Global Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Moneter : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 3(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.61132/moneter.v3i1.1094
Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2005). The Vest Pocket CFO. John Wiley & Sons.
Simanjuntak, J. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Kewenangan Kreditor Mengajukan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Honeste Vivere, 33(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i1.193
Sitompul, N. A. (2021). Konsep Corporate Rescue Dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 5(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v5i1.43604
Soelistyo, L. T. D., & Wahjoeono, D. (2022). Problematika Hukum Proses Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Tetap Oleh Kreditor. Maleo Law Journal, 6(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.56338/mlj.v6i1.2202
Tomasic, R. A. (2006). Creditor Participation in Insolvency Proceedings—Towards the Adoption of International Standards. SSRN Electronic Journal, 14, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443762
Wibowo, D. P. (2023). Restrukturisasi Utang Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Debitor Mencegah Kepailitan. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, 2(2), 1–25.
Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Publika Global Media. http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/14688
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aliif Ahmad Akbar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.