The Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trademark Protection in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v4i1.1155Keywords:
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property Rights, Trademark Regulation, TrademarksAbstract
This article examines the challenges and solutions in trademark dispute resolution in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of existing regulations and the implementation of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration. While Law No. 20 of 2016 provides legal protection for registered trademarks, law enforcement in the digital era faces numerous challenges, including trademark infringements occurring on e-commerce platforms. The article demonstrates that ADR can offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to litigation; however, a key challenge lies in the limited awareness among business actors about the benefits of ADR. Consequently, this article recommends enhancing education for business owners, strengthening regulations related to ADR, and improving the quality of mediators and arbitrators in the field of intellectual property law. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the need for integrating technology into the dispute resolution process to improve efficiency and accessibility.
Downloads
References
Abdurahman, H. (2020). Asas Fisrt to File Principal Dalam Kasus Hak Merek Nama Terkenal Bensu. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 3(1), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v0i0.6056
Adarsh, S., Ash, E., Bechtold, S., Beebe, B., & Fromer, J. C. (2024). Automating Abercrombie: Machine‐learning Trademark Distinctiveness. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 21(4), 826–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12398
Adityanto, R. (2017). Kedudukan Basyarnas Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/Puu-X/2012). Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v1i2.15
Agus, A., Sudirman, S., Umar, W., & Rustan, A. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration: The Potential and Challenges. Sasi, 29(3), 570. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1393
‘Aisy, F. R. (2022). Efektivitas Perjanjian Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lisensi Merek Dagang di Indonesia. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 1(12), 1266–1272. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v1i12.1302
Ariani, N. V. (2018). Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.v18.381-396
Aspriola, V. A., & Israd, A. C. (2022). Pelanggaran Merek Dagang Dalam Kasus Persamaan Nama Merek Pada Geprek Bensu Menurut Undang Undang UU No. 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Journal Evidence of Law, 1(3), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v1i3.101
Ayuhandika, N., Putri, R. M. S., & Yovitasari, A. (2023). Putusan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Perdata Khusus Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 8(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v8i2.9030
Betlehn, A., & Samosir, P. O. (2018). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Industri UMKM di Indonesia. Law and Justice, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v3i1.6080
Broekhuizen, T., Giarratana, M. S., & Torres, A. (2017). Uncertainty Avoidance and the Exploration-Exploitation Trade-Off. European Journal of Marketing, 51(11/12), 2080–2100. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-05-2016-0264
Budiono, A., Prastyanti, R. A., Irawan, N., Septyanun, N., Saputro, K. I., & Rosada, M. (2022). Legal Counseling Implementation of Registration and Brand Permits for MSME Actors. Jurnal Altifani Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(3), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.25008/altifani.v2i3.235
Fitri, S., Askar, N. A., Loemnanu, A. H., & Devi, N. N. A. S. (2024). Legal Protection on the Brand Owners for Counterfeiting Brands Traded Through Electronic Transactions on Online Marketplace Platforms (E-Commerce). Daengku Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 4(3), 484–488. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.daengku2577
Gojali, D. (2023). Menyelesaikan Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Prinsip Hukum Islam di Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Praktik dan Prospek. Komitmen Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 4(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.15575/jim.v4i2.29013
Gurning, T. E., Permata, R. R., & Sudaryat, S. (2023). Urgensi Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital. Comserva Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(08), 3241–3251. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i08.1107
Hadiati, M., & Tampi, M. M. (2017). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v6i1.1908
Herfianto, R., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. (2024). Juridical Analysis of the Element of Bad Faith in the Brand Rights Ownership Dispute Between Ruben Samuel Onsu and PT. Benny Sujono’s Geprek Chicken Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 Concerning Brands and Geographical Indications (Study of Supreme Court Deci. Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 22(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.4387
Hidayat, M. R., & Komarudin, P. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Melalui Jalur Litigasi dan Non-Litigasi. Al-Adl Jurnal Hukum, 11(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v11i2.1936
Jamilus, J. (2020). Optimalisasi Mediasi Kekayaan Intelektual di Kementerian Hukum dan HAM. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.37-48
Jasmine, T. F. (2021). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Urgensi Pendaftaran Merek Bagi Pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) (Studi Putusan Nomor 646 K/Pst.Sus-HKI/2021). Luris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 644–652. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.186
Jia, Z. (2024). Protection of Well-Known Trademarks Under the Internet. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 68(1), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/68/20241419
Nanda, B. S. T., Yulia, Y., & Jafar, S. (2023). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 576 K/PDT Sus-Hki 2020 tentang Pemegang Hak Merek Geprek Bensu. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v6i4.13332
Nusantara, E. M. (2024). Relevansi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Pemberlakuan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v6i1.1-17
Pambudi, L. A., Wakhid, N., Mukhsinun, M., Faradz, H., Kupita, W., Siswanta, A. R. L., & Haryanto, B. S. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Nama Domain Tiktok Melalui World Intellectual Property Organizations Arbitration and Mediation Center. SLR, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2023.5.2.14191
Pokrovskaya, A. (2024). Protection of Trademark Rights on E-Commerce Platforms: An Updated Outlook. Jcbar, 1(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewjcbar42022153
Prameswari, A., & Aidi, Z. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek di Indonesia Studi Kasus Antara MS GLOW vs PS GLOW. Notarius, 17(3), 780–793.
Prayuti, Y., Lany, A., Takaryanto, D., Hamdan, A. R., Ciptawan, B., & Nugroho, E. A. (2024). Efektivitas Mediasi Dan Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kesehatan. Syntax Idea, 6(3), 1533–1544. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3165
Putri, C. W., Suherman, S., W, Y. Y., Harefa, B., & Satino, S. (2023). Legal Annotation of Court Decision Number 75/Pdt.Sus-Ipr/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst in Administrative Certainty for Famous Brands in Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 3(11), 2243–2252. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i11.6836
Rahaditya, R., Goldwen, F., Fernandha, R. D., S, C. O., Aryadi, A. M., & Rahmasari, L. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, 6(2), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v6i2.2040
Ramin, Moh. (2023). Sengketa Merek Dagang di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Ays, 1(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v1i1.6
Silalahi, P. H., & Soemartono, G. P. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pengusaha Atas Produk Skincare Merek Palsu Pada Marketplace Shopee. Ranah Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(4), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v6i4.857
Suflah, S. N. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal dari Tindakan Pelanggaran Merek/Merek Tiruan di Medan (Studi Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis). Luris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.185
Sulistianingsih, D., & Prabowo, M. S. (2019). Problematik dan Karakteristik Penyelesaian Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia. Qistie, 12(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v12i2.3135
Svinarky, I., Ukas, U., & Jamba, P. (2018). Efektivitas Undang-Undang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Terhadap Daftar Merek Usaha Dagang Industri Kecil dan Menengah. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 7(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2018.v07.i01.p06
Syamhadi, S., Adiman, M. F., & Dewi, R. S. (2023). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Litigasi Paten Terhadap Perkembangan Inovasi Teknologi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Ham Wara Sains, 2(12), 1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i12.873
Vitalii, V. (2024). Legal Aspects Related to Intellectual Property Protection in the Field of Digital E-Commerce Technologies. International Journal of Religion, 5(3), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.61707/3rsvme33
Waruwu, A. H., Kamello, T., Azwar, T. K. D., & Harris, Abd. (2023). Kewenangan Arbiter Dalam Memutus Sengketa Bisnis Arbitrase Secara Ex Aequo Et Bono. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(12), 986–999. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i12.268
Widiatmika, R., Gorda, A. A. A. Ngr. S. R., Kurniawan, I. G. A., & Huzaif, S. M. (2023). The Problems Related to Potential Trademark Rights Infringement: Construction in Inclusive Legal Perspective on Unregistered Marks. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 23(3), 499. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.3.3724
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Novi Rahayu Ningsih, Moh. Karim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Justice Voice is licensed under a 