A Juridical Analysis of Breach of Contract in Technology-Based Distribution Project Agreements: A Study of Decision Number 821/Pdt.G/2023/PN JKT.SEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v5i2.1528Keywords:
Null and Void, Inadmissible Claim, Digital Financial Innovation, Administrative Legality, Electronic System ProviderAbstract
This study aims to analyze whether the absence of Electronic System Provider Registration (TD PSE) and Digital Financial Innovation (IKD) registration at the time the agreement was concluded rendered the Distribution Project Agreement between PT Fairbanc Technologies Indonesia and CV Sinar null and void due to the failure to satisfy the requirement of a lawful cause, and to examine the legal consequences of Decision Number 821/Pdt.G/2023/PN JKT.SEL for the breach of contract claim and the possibility of refiling the lawsuit. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and document study and were subsequently analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that, textually, the Distribution Project Agreement contains contractual elements relating to the parties, the object of cooperation, service fees, payment security funds, maturity dates, and penalties for late payment, and may therefore serve as a basis for assessing breach of contract if the agreement is deemed valid and binding. The panel of judges did not examine the alleged breach of contract on its merits because it first declared the agreement null and void due to issues concerning the administrative legality of TD PSE and IKD registration. The study concludes that a decision declaring the claim inadmissible does not eliminate the possibility of establishing a substantive breach of contract, but it requires a revised legal construction should PT Fairbanc Technologies Indonesia refile the lawsuit.
Downloads
References
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Effendy, E. E., & Hanifah, G. (2025). Keabsahan Perjanjian Elektronik yang Termuat dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik. Notary Journal, 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.19166/nj.v5i1.8241
Hamonangan, M., & Arifin, Z. (2025). Analisa pertimbangan hakim terhadap gugatan perceraian yang tidak dapat diterima: Niet ontvankelijke verklaard. Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD), 25(1), 77. doi:https://doi.org/10.61234/hd.v25i1.99
Istisofania, A. S., Simbolon, E. Z., & Julydya, P. D. (2025). Analisis tentang kewenangan hakim dalam pemeriksaan perkara litigasi perdata. Multilingual: Journal of Universal Studies, 5(1), 354-368. From https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/multilingual/article/view/1116
Iwanti, N. A., & Taun. (2022). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi serta Upaya Hukum Wanprestasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku. The Juris, 6(2), 346-351. doi:https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.601
Kadafi, A. A. (2025). A juridical review of breach of contract in commercial cooperation agreements in Indonesia. Justicia Insight, 1(2), 50-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.70716/justin.v1i2.160
Kennedy, A. (2025). Perbuatan melawan hukum sebagai upaya perlindungan terhadap hak subjektif. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 3(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.287
Meilany, D. e. (2024). Analisis yuridis terhadap pelanggaran syarat objektif dalam Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Letterlijk, 1(2), 56-66. doi:https://doi.org/10.25134/letterlijk.v1i2.105
Nafi’a, Z. I., & Priyono, E. A. (2025). Perkembangan hukum perjanjian di era digital: Tinjauan atas kontrak elektronik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(4), 3327-3333. doi:https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4452
Paendong, K., & Taunaumang, H. (2022). Kajian yuridis wanprestasi dalam perikatan dan perjanjian ditinjau dari hukum perdata. Lex Privatum, 10(3), 1-7. From https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v2/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/41642
Putra, I. G., Budiartha, I. N. P.,, I. N., & Ujianti, N. M. (2020). Gugatan tidak dapat diterima (Niet ontvankelijke verklaard) dalam gugatan cerai gugat di Pengadilan Agama Badung. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(2), 305-309. doi:https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.1.2.2565.305-309
Putra, S. A., & Fathoni, M. Y. (2024). Pengaturan wanprestasi dalam perjanjian kontrak kerja berdasarkan ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Private Law, 4(1), 122-127. From http://journal.unram.ac.id/index.php/privatelaw/index
Rizki, I. A., & Ningsih, R. (2026). Kualifikasi putusan niet ontvankelijke verklaard dalam perspektif error in procedendo. Verstek, 14(2), 266–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i2.116020
Sahib, N. S. (2023). Problematika aturan Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik (PSE) di Indonesia. Pancasakti Law Journal, 1(1), 61-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.24905/plj.v1i1.8
Salsabila, D. e. (2023). Efektivitas keabsahan kontrak elektronik berdasarkan hukum positif di Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1343-1354. doi:https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3085
Saparyanto. (2021). Perkembangan keabsahan kontrak elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9(1), 137-143. doi:https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v9i1.51589
Septiaji, S. A. (2025). Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Penjamin Dalam Borgtocht: Tinjauan Atas Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Advokasi, 13(2), 528-551. doi:https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i2.7363
Septiani, I. (2023). Kepastian hukum perjanjian penanggungan pribadi (borgtocht) yang dibuat secara di bawah tangan tanpa persetujuan pasangan. Indonesian Notary, 5(2), 40-57. From https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol5/iss2/3/
Wardani, I. S., & Qurrotulaini, A. S. (2024). Kontrak Elektronik dalam Mekanisme Hukum di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8068–8073. doi:https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1707
Yudhantaka, L. e. (2025). Sengketa Kontrak Bisnis: Mediasi-Arbitrase sebagai Solusi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Malang: Setara Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Olga Pavita Chrisworo, Lintang Yudhantaka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Justice Voice is licensed under a 