The Use of Special Terminals for the Interests of Other Parties: An Analysis of the Authority and Discretion of the Harbormaster and Port Authority Office (KSOP) from the Perspective of Legal Certainty

Authors

  • Asmaru Amru University Al-Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sadino Sadino University Al-Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Suartini Suartini University Al-Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v5i2.1532

Keywords:

Administrative Discretion, Harbormaster and Port Authority Office (KSOP), Legal Certainty, Loading and Unloading, Port Administration, Special Terminal (Tersus)

Abstract

In principle, a Special Terminal (Terminal Khusus, Tersus) is established to support the business activities of its owner and is not intended to serve the public interest. In practice, however, limitations in the capacity and facilities of public ports have resulted in Tersus facilities frequently being used for the loading and unloading of goods belonging to other parties through an authorization mechanism. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the use of Tersus facilities by other parties, the practical needs underlying such use, and the authorization mechanism and authority of the Harbormaster and Port Authority Office (Kantor Kesyahbandaran dan Otoritas Pelabuhan, KSOP) in granting approval. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and legal-theoretical approaches, drawing on legal positivism, the theory of authority, administrative law theory, and the theory of legal certainty. The findings demonstrate that Law Number 17 of 2008, Government Regulation Number 61 of 2009, and Minister of Transportation Regulation Number PM 52 of 2021 provide a legal basis for the use of Tersus facilities by other parties but do not comprehensively regulate the parameters, procedures, and criteria for granting authorization. This regulatory gap leaves considerable scope for administrative discretion by the KSOP, potentially creating legal uncertainty and disparities in policy implementation. Accordingly, regulatory harmonization, clearer technical guidelines, and simplified authorization mechanisms are required to enhance legal certainty and the effectiveness of public services and to support the efficient operation of national logistics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. P., Alfiyah, M. F., Hardyanto, Z. B., & Sukoco, M. (2025). Penyelesaian Inharmonis Hukum (Konsep, Tantangan, dan Pendekatan dalam Sistem Peradilan). Justitiable - Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.56071/justitiable.v7i2.1163

Apriani, D. D., Perdana, F. W., & H. Irwan. (2022). Disharmoni Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Pelabuhan dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pelayaran. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 2(10), 2723–6595.https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v2i10.449

Ardyantara, D. M., Sukarna, K., Sadono, B., & Arifin, Z. (2020). Reposisi Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Negara Dalam Pengaturan Terkait Pertahanan Keamanan Kemaritiman Nasional. In Jurnal USM Law Review (Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 404–418). Universitas Semarang. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2593

Berutu, R. P., Iskandar, H., & Syahputra, D. (2023). Analisis Kepastian Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Tentang Uji Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 6(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v6i2.8391

Boyke, C. (2019). Perencanaan Pelabuhan dan Terminal. In ITS Press (Vol. 1, Issue August 2015). ITS Press.

Darsono, N., Syibli, Y. M., & Fajar, M. A. (2021). Peranan Kesyahbandaran dan Otoritas Pelabuhan Khusus Batam Dalam Izin Pembangunan Terminal Khusus. Jurnal Sains Teknologi Transportasi Maritim, 3(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.51578/j.sitektransmar.v3i2.40

Gultom, E. (2017). Pelabuhan Indonesia sebagai Penyumbang Devisa Negara dalam Perspektif Hukum Bisnis. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(3), 419–444.

Guntur Dano Muhammad, A. M. E. (2025). Dampak Transportasi Laut Terhadap Ekonomi Global di Sulawesi Tenggara. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(2), 5209–5215.

Halilah, S., & Arif, F. (2021). Asas Kepastian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli. Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 4(Desember), 56–65.

Kartini, S., Kelana, S., Santoso, S., Marpaung, M. H. F., & Khoirunnisa, K. (2022). Tinjauan Pengoperasian Terminal Khusus Pada Wilayah Kerja Tanjung Api-Api. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 6(3), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v6i3.2737

Kurniawan, I., Marniati, F. S., & Irhamsah, I. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Akta Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Pemeritah DKI Jakarta Dengan Pihak Pengembang Terkait Pemenuhan Kewajiban Fasilitas Sosial Dan Fasilitas Umum Yang Telah Disetujui Dalam Surat Izin Penunjukan Penggunaan Tanah (SIPPT). In SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah (Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 622–632). LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i2.2301

Kusumawardhani, D. L. L. H. N. (2023). Hakekat dan Implementasi Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Suara Pengabdian 45, 2(4), 9–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56444/pengabdian45.v2i4.1207

Latifa, A., Frinaldi, A., & Roberia, R. (2024). Penerapan Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Membangun Pemerintahan yang Baik. Polyscopia, 1(3), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.57251/polyscopia.v1i3.1376

Manullang, E. F. M. (2022). Misinterpretasi Ide Gustav Radbruch mengenai Doktrin Filosofis tentang Validitas dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. 5(2), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.453-480

Mursalin, M., Heriyanto, M., & Yuliani, F. (2021). Kinerja Pelayanan Publik Pada Kantor Kesyahbandaran Dan Otoritas Pelabuhan (KSOP) Kelas IV Bagansiapiapi. Pro Patria: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kewarganegaraan, Hukum, Sosial, Dan Politik, 4(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.47080/propatria.v4i2.1431

Mursidah, I. (2024). Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Pengadilan sebagai Preseden: Antara Teori dan Praktik. In YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan (Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 27–34). Kalimasada Group. https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v2i3.1669

Nurani, N., Apriwandi, & Bagja, H. N. (2025). Sui Generis Geographical Indications: Reforming Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Rights for Agricultural Protection. International Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 309–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v4i2.344

Purwanto, Y. I. (2015, July 29). Dampak Tol Laut Jokowi Bagi Industri Kapal Indonesia. Kompasiana.Com, Diakses 10 Juli 2026.

Putri, N. T. P., & Aulia, A. (2023). Penerapan Teori Positivisme Hans Kelsen di Indonesia. Das: Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kotemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx

Royani, E., Siahaan, D. H., Syafliansah, H., & Tukimun. (2022). Hukum kepelabuhan (Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Pelayanan dan Keselamatan Lingkungan) (D. R. Rizqian, Ed.). Amerta Media.

Sharon, G. (2021). Teori Wewenang Dan Perizinan. Jounal UMG, 3(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v3i1.2249

Sitompul, P. H., Nasution, M., Harianto, D., & Mubarak, R. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Tentang Pengembangan Pelabuhan Di Daerah Sesuai Undang-Undang tentang Pelayaran Kaitannya dengan Undang-Undang tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 2(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v2i2.129

Suhenriko, M. (2023). Implementasi Teori Hierarki Hans Kelsen Terhadap Perumusan Kebijakan Di Indonesia. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 1(2), 64–71.

Wardoyo, R. D., Supartini, & Dekananwati, V. (2020). Perizinan Pembangunan Tersus (Terminal Khusus) (Studi Kasus CV Bina Lestari Jaya) Di Pangkalpinang Bangka Belitung. Majalah Ilmiah Bahari Jogja, 18(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.33489/mibj.v18i2.219

Downloads

Published

13-09-2026

How to Cite

Amru, A., Sadino, S., & Suartini, S. (2026). The Use of Special Terminals for the Interests of Other Parties: An Analysis of the Authority and Discretion of the Harbormaster and Port Authority Office (KSOP) from the Perspective of Legal Certainty. Justice Voice, 5(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v5i2.1532