Monopoly Practice of PT. Carrefour Indonesia After Acquiring The Shares of PT. Alfa Retailindo

Study of KPPU Decision Number 09/KPPU-L/2009

Authors

  • Kuirinus Kabul Faculty of Law, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
  • Hendra Haryanto Faculty of Law, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
  • Yessy Kusumadewi Faculty of Law, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4317-857X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v2i1.395

Keywords:

Competition, Dominant Position, Monopolistic Practices

Abstract

The study of The Decision of KPPU Number 09/KPPU-L/2009 to obtain an overview of the reasons for the KPPU to decide that Carrefour has committed monopolistic practices and the legal impact of the decision. By using the juridical research method, that is examining the KPPU’s decision to obtain data on the KPPU’s reasons for stating that PT. Carrefour Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as Carrefour) has committed monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Where after the acquisition of PT. Alfa Retailindo shares, Carrefour managed to control the market by 57.999% and to achieve this position, Carrefour implemented various market entry barriers. Other business actors cannot enter the relevant market. Such barriers may include the imposition of different entry fees from one company to another. Because Carrefour was found guilty, the KPPU ordered that Carrefour must return Alfa’s shares. The problem is that Law Number 5 Year 1999 does not have provisions governing the mechanism for returning the shares. Thus, KPPU should amend Law Number 5 Year 1999 specifically related to the mechanism for returning shares resulting from acquisitions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almanda, Bryan Fanani, Muhammad R Anam, and Diego Bagas P Sitowing. 2019. “Akibat Hukum Atas Keterlambatan Pelaporan Pengambilalihan Saham Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Kasus Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 7/KPPU-R/III/2.” Jurnal Hukum Positum 4 (2): 14–24.

Bryan A. Garner. 2014. Black’s Law Dictionary 10th Edition. United States: Thomson West.

Cooter, Robert D, and Uri Y Hacohen. 2020. “Progress in the Useful Arts: Foundations of Patent Law in Growth Economics.” Yale JL & Tech. 22: 191.

Cooter, Robert, and Michael Gilbert. 2022. Public Law and Economics. England: Oxford University Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59253.

Fitri, D, S Sihabudin, and B Winarno. 2019. “Status Kepemilikan Saham Hasil Pembatalan Penggabungan Perseroan Terbatas Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 10 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.

Ganie, A Junaidi. 2023. Hukum Asuransi Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Indonesia. 1999. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (LN No. 33 Tahun 1999, TLN No. 3817).

Inu. 2010. “MA Menangkan Carrefour.” Hukum Online.Com. 2010. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/putusan-kasasi-ma-kppu-carrefour-lt4ceba3ce64e9e/.

Posner, Richard A. 2014. Economic Analysis of Law. United State of America: Aspen Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=o77fDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT30&dq=Richard+A.+Posner,+Economic+Analysis+of+Law&ots=tzfPtDJZQx&sig=SXrco-ofjt5kNqsmejc75j7xTBU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Putri, Preeti Kartika, Paramita Prananingtyas, and Siti Mahmudah. 2019. “Analisa Yuridis Pengawasan KPPU Atas Tindakan Merger Yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Pertambangan Di Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Journal 8 (2): 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.25467.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2023

How to Cite

Kabul, K., Haryanto, H., & Kusumadewi, Y. (2023). Monopoly Practice of PT. Carrefour Indonesia After Acquiring The Shares of PT. Alfa Retailindo: Study of KPPU Decision Number 09/KPPU-L/2009. Justice Voice, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v2i1.395