Hans Kelsen’s Nomostatics and Nomodinamics Legal Theory

Authors

  • Cahya Iradi Arimba Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v2i2.773

Keywords:

Hans Kelsen, Theory, Law

Abstract

Hans Kelsen is a famous figure in the positivist school, which puts forward the concept of pure law (the pure theory of law) in the concept Hans Kelsen provides two legal theories, namely static law (nomostatics) and dynamic law (nomodinamics). The purpose of this research is to understand the two legal theories put forward by Hans Kelsen, about static and dynamic law. The method used in this research is the normative juridical method with secondary legal materials in the form of books and journals that have a relevant research focus. Nomostatics legal theory is the law as a system of norms that apply, law in its resting state while nomodynamics legal theory is the process when the law is created and applied and the law is in running condition. In using a legal theory as a basis for making a law, it is necessary to be as clear as possible about the theory in the hope that the legal theory remains relevant for the next few years so that a legal theory truly follows its purpose, namely to know legal acts and to assess these acts. A legal theory is not always perfect in terms of its relevance to the times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, M. A. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Fauzan, A. (2022). Kritik Dasar Aliran Positivisme Teori Hans Kelsen (Studi Kasus Terhadap Polemik Legalisasi Ganja di Indonesia). At-Tanwir Law Review, 2(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v2i2.2025.

Hakim, N. A. (2018). Titik Taut Relevansi Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum Bagi Pembangunan Konsep Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.59635/jihk.v5i1.112.

Haris, O. K. (2014). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Perizinan di Bidang Pertambangan. Yuridika, 29(3), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i3.376.

Humiati, H. (2020). Komentar Terhadap Hukum dan Masyarakat Dalam Pemikiran John Austin, H.L.A. Hart dan Hans Kelsen. Yurijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 3(1), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.51213/yurijaya.v3i1.38.

Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2019). Teori Hukum: Dilema antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan (Edisi 2). Yrama Widya.

Manan, B. (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia (Satu Kajian Teoritik). FH UII Press.

Mappatunru, A. M. D. (2020). The Pure Theory of Law Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pembentukan Hukum Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v2i2.541.

Rizhan, A. (2020). Konsep Hukum dan Ide Keadilan Berdasarkan Teori Hukum Statis (Nomostatics) Hans Kelsen. Kodifikasi, 2(1), 61–71. https://ejournal.uniks.ac.id/index.php/kodifikasi/article/view/679.

Rokilah, R., & Sulasno, S. (2021). Penerapan Asas Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3942.

Soekanto, S. (1976). Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum Dalam Kerangka Pembangunan di Indonesia. Yayasan Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2021). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1: Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan. Kanisius.

Sumakto, Y. (2012). Pancasila di Dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945 Bukan Grundnorm. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v3i1.832.

Syaputra, M. Y. A. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penegasan Hiearaki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Stufen Theorie. Jurnal Mercatoria, 9(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v9i2.433.

Wibowo, M. (2021). Perkembangan Politik Hukum Islam Pasca Reformasi Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Hans Kelsen. Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(4), 1985–1994. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss4/25/.

Downloads

Published

02-06-2024

How to Cite

Arimba, C. I. (2024). Hans Kelsen’s Nomostatics and Nomodinamics Legal Theory. Justice Voice, 2(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v2i2.773